Real Men Tax Gas

THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Do we owe the French and other Europeans a second look when it comes to their willingness to exercise power in today’s world? Was it really fair for some to call the French and other Europeans “cheese-eating surrender monkeys?” Is it time to restore the French in “French fries” at the Congressional dining room, and stop calling them “Freedom Fries?” Why do I ask these profound questions?

Because we are once again having one of those big troop debates: Do we send more forces to Afghanistan, and are we ready to do what it takes to “win” there? This argument will be framed in many ways, but you can set your watch on these chest-thumpers: “toughness,” “grit,” “fortitude,” “willingness to do whatever it takes to realize big stakes” — all the qualities we tend to see in ourselves, with some justification, but not in Europeans.

But are we really that tough? If the metric is a willingness to send troops to Iraq and Afghanistan and consider the use of force against Iran, the answer is yes. And we should be eternally grateful to the Americans willing to go off and fight those fights. But in another way — when it comes to doing things that would actually weaken the people we are sending our boys and girls to fight — we are total wimps. We are, in fact, the wimps of the world. We are, in fact, so wimpy our politicians are afraid to even talk about how wimpy we are.

How so? France today generates nearly 80 percent of its electricity from nuclear power plants, and it has managed to deal with all the radioactive waste issues without any problems or panics. And us? We get about 20 percent and have not been able or willing to build one new nuclear plant since the Three Mile Island accident in 1979, even though that accident led to no deaths or injuries to plant workers or neighbors. We’re too afraid to store nuclear waste deep in Nevada’s Yucca Mountain — totally safe — at a time when French mayors clamor to have reactors in their towns to create jobs. In short, the French stayed the course on clean nuclear power, despite Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, and we ran for cover.

How about Denmark? Little Denmark, sweet, never-hurt-a-fly Denmark, was hit hard by the 1973 Arab oil embargo. In 1973, Denmark got all its oil from the Middle East. Today? Zero. Why? Because Denmark got tough. It imposed on itself a carbon tax, a roughly $5-a-gallon gasoline tax, made massive investments in energy efficiency and in systems to generate energy from waste, along with a discovery of North Sea oil (about 40 percent of its needs).

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• US’s Yucca Mountain nuclear project in meltdown (telegraph.co.uk)
• Securing Long Term Nuclear Waste Storage “Not an Urgent Problem” (treehugger.com)
• Ground for concern about radioactive waste cleanup (thestar.com)
• Alberta businesses, scientists push for fusion power (canada.com)

Random Posts:

• Software Wrapper For Smarter, Networked Homes
• The “Crisis” In Venture Capital
• Biofuel: Major Net Energy Gain From Switchgrass-based Ethanol
• A Paper Trail for Voting Machines
• Invisibility Cloak And Ultra-powerful Microscopes: New Research Field Promises Radical Advances In Optical Technologies

Related posts:

1. What is the Real Cost of Power Production?
2. Less Is More for Designers of “Right-Sized” Nuclear Reactors
3. Our One-Party Democracy
4. Will Big Business Save the Earth?
5. New-Generation Reactors Help Reduce Nuclear Waste

Tags: cheese eating surrender monkeys, Innovation, nuclear plant, nuclear power plants, nuclear waste, panics, profound questions, Radioactive waste

This entry was posted on Sunday, September 20th, 2009 at 11:51 am and is filed under Consider This, Innovation Needed, NY Times, Need to Know, Project Energy, economics, environment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.