NPR Recognizes It Makes Business Sense To Give Up Content Cash Cow And Go Free

from the good-for-them dept

A few months ago, Newsweek ran an excellent interview with NPR CEO Vivian Schiller, who only recently joined the organization, after leaving the NY Times. The interview showed that Schiller totally understands the problems and issues facing journalism today. She’s embracing better web interaction, recognizing that NPR isn’t a “radio” operation, but a news operation, that NPR has strong advantages in terms of having local reporters on the ground around the country — and, perhaps most interesting of all, that “free” is not a bad thing:

While employed by The New York Times, you helped the newspaper stop charging for online content. Now it’s reconsidering. Generally, why do you oppose paying for content?
I am a staunch believer that people will not in large numbers pay for news content online. It’s almost like there’s mass delusion going on in the industry–They’re saying we really really need it, that we didn’t put up a pay wall 15 years ago, so let’s do it now. In other words, they think that wanting it so badly will automatically actually change the behavior of the audience. The world doesn’t work that way. Frankly, if all the news organizations locked pinkies, and said we’re all going to put up a big fat pay wall, you know what, more traffic for us. News is a commodity; I’m sorry to say.

But the Times did get people to pay, right?
We far exceeded our expectation–225,000 subscribers paid $50 a year, in addition to the home delivery subscribers, who got all of the Web for free. But guess what, that’s $10 million. Instead of 225,000 who pay the $50, let’s say it’s one million subscribers. OK. That’s $50 million a year. That’s not going to save any newspaper. It’s going to kill your advertising base. The numbers don’t work.

It appears that she’s putting this realization to work in other ways, a bunch of readers have been submitting an NPR blog post explaining why it has stopped charging for transcripts of programs, and started offering them for free on its website. Despite being something of a cash cow for NPR, the organization realized that it was short-sighted to lock up the content, and went against what people wanted:

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• San Francisco Chronicle Wants You to Pay For Phil Bronstein’s Pearls of Wisdom (gawker.com)
• The Price Of Journalism (cenblog.org)
• Why NPR is the Future of Mainstream Media (mashable.com)

Random Posts:

• Assistive Technology Helps Dementia Sufferers Get Through the Day
• The Medium Is No Longer The Message, . . . You Are
• Gates Foundation Pledges $35 Million for Banking Innovation
• Intergalactic Controversy
• Opening Doors on the Way to a Personal Robot

Related posts:

1. Free the H-1Bs, Free the Economy
2. Evening Standard to be free paper
3. Will Big Business Save the Earth?
4. Open Source as a Model for Business Is Elusive
5. The Argument for Free Classes via iTunes

Tags: better web, home delivery subscribers, journalism today, large numbers, mass delusion, new york times, news content, newsweek, npr, NY Times, schiller

This entry was posted on Thursday, September 3rd, 2009 at 10:04 am and is filed under Consider This, IP, Innovation, Innovation Needed, Need to Know, Techdirt. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.