Beneficial Biofuels: Leading National Experts Reach Consensus

Biofuels can be produced in large quantities and have multiple benefits, but only if they come from feedstocks produced with low life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions, as well as minimal competition with food production. This consensus emerges in a new journal article by researchers from the University of Minnesota, Princeton, MIT and the University of California, Berkeley.

“The world needs to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy, but recent findings have thrown the emerging biofuels industry into a quandary. We met to seek solutions,” said the U of M’s David Tilman, a noted ecologist and lead author of the paper. “We found that the next generation of biofuels can be highly beneficial if produced properly.”

The article, “Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy and Environment Trilemma,” will appear in the July 17 issue of Science. Tilman, a resident fellow of the U of M’s Institute on the Environment, said the paper resulted from a year of conversations and debate among some of the nation’s leading biofuel experts.

In addition to Tilman, the article contributors include the U of M’s Jonathan Foley and Jason Hill; Princeton’s Robert Socolow, Eric Larson, Stephen Pacala, Tim Searchinger and Robert Williams; Dartmouth’s Lee Lynd; MIT’s John Reilly; and the University of California, Berkeley’s Chris Somerville.

The paper coincides with climate change policy debates in Congress, and tackles land use issues that have generated much controversy in recent years: Specifically, the greenhouse gases released when land is cleared to grow biofuel crops (or when other lands are cleared to compensate for food crops displaced by biofuel crops) can—for decades to centuries—exceed those from petroleum use.

“It’s essential that legislation take the best science into account, even when that requires acknowledging and undoing earlier mistakes,” said Princeton’s Socolow, co-director of the Carbon Mitigation Initiative.

“Careful scientific reasoning revealed accounting rules that separate promising from self-defeating strategies,” added Socolow. “Future carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere will tell us when we’re kidding ourselves about what actually works. For carbon management, the atmosphere is the ultimate accountant.”

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• Planes ’should fly on biofuels’ (news.bbc.co.uk)
• Growth of global carbon emissions halved in 2008, say Dutch researchers (guardian.co.uk)
• U.S.: CO2 pollution to rise 40 percent (msnbc.msn.com)
• Farmers call for more funding to ‘make the most of the countryside’ (telegraph.co.uk)
• China recruits algae to combat climate change (guardian.co.uk)

Random Posts:

• Solar Power Game-changer: ‘Near Perfect’ Absorption Of Sunlight, From All Angles
• TheFunded Founder Gives Startups Some Advice
• Facebook Weekend BETA is Here!
• Hexakopter: remote-control helicopter puts on amazing aerial display
• AlterG M300 Anti-Gravity Treadmill: train or rehabilitate weightlessly

Related posts:

1. In Search Of Wildlife-friendly Biofuels: Are Native Prairie Plants the Answer?
2. A Bloom in Biofuels
3. Some Biofuels Are Worse Environmentally Than Fossil Fuels, Analysis Shows
4. Is Algae Worse than Corn for Biofuels?
5. Co-location could make algae biofuels affordable

Tags: biofuels, carbon mitigation initiative, climate change policy, food crops, greenhouse gas emissions, greenhouse gases, Innovation, minimal competition, robert socolow

This entry was posted on Sunday, July 26th, 2009 at 6:25 pm and is filed under Consider This, Project Energy, Science Digest / Science Daily, The Food Challenge, environment, food. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.