Betraying the Planet

Image via Wikipedia

Paul Krugman

So the House passed the Waxman-Markey climate-change bill. In political terms, it was a remarkable achievement.

But 212 representatives voted no. A handful of these no votes came from representatives who considered the bill too weak, but most rejected the bill because they rejected the whole notion that we have to do something about greenhouse gases.

And as I watched the deniers make their arguments, I couldn’t help thinking that I was watching a form of treason — treason against the planet.

To fully appreciate the irresponsibility and immorality of climate-change denial, you need to know about the grim turn taken by the latest climate research.

The fact is that the planet is changing faster than even pessimists expected: ice caps are shrinking, arid zones spreading, at a terrifying rate. And according to a number of recent studies, catastrophe — a rise in temperature so large as to be almost unthinkable — can no longer be considered a mere possibility. It is, instead, the most likely outcome if we continue along our present course.

Thus researchers at M.I.T., who were previously predicting a temperature rise of a little more than 4 degrees by the end of this century, are now predicting a rise of more than 9 degrees. Why? Global greenhouse gas emissions are rising faster than expected; some mitigating factors, like absorption of carbon dioxide by the oceans, are turning out to be weaker than hoped; and there’s growing evidence that climate change is self-reinforcing — that, for example, rising temperatures will cause some arctic tundra to defrost, releasing even more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Temperature increases on the scale predicted by the M.I.T. researchers and others would create huge disruptions in our lives and our economy. As a recent authoritative U.S. government report points out, by the end of this century New Hampshire may well have the climate of North Carolina today, Illinois may have the climate of East Texas, and across the country extreme, deadly heat waves — the kind that traditionally occur only once in a generation — may become annual or biannual events.

In other words, we’re facing a clear and present danger to our way of life, perhaps even to civilization itself. How can anyone justify failing to act?

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• Scientists Urge Governments to Stem Ocean Acidification (takepart.com)
• A weather forecast we daren’t ignore (guardian.co.uk)
• Todd Stern rejects calls for 40% cut in US emissions (guardian.co.uk)
• Gazprom and Dow Chemical Expand Emissions Alliance (nytimes.com)
• House passes sweeping energy, climate bill (money.cnn.com)
• Carbon Trading on the Cheap (technologyreview.com)
• Obama Urges Senate to Pass Climate Bill (abcnews.go.com)
• Government report: climate change here, mitigation needed now (arstechnica.com)

Tags: arctic tundra, climate change, climate research, global greenhouse, greenhouse gas emissions, greenhouse gases, Innovation, paul krugman, temperature increases, temperature rise

This entry was posted on Monday, June 29th, 2009 at 7:58 am and is filed under Consider This, Cutting-edge Research, Innovation Needed, NY Times, economics, environment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.