Who Says Innovation Belongs to the Small?

FOR more than a decade, the prevailing view of innovation has been that little guys had the edge. Innovation bubbled up from the bottom, from upstarts and insurgents. Big companies didn’t innovate, and government got in the way. In the dominant innovation narrative, venture-backed start-up companies were cast as the nimble winners and large corporations as the sluggish losers.

There was a rich vein of business-school research supporting the notion that innovation comes most naturally from small-scale outsiders. That was the headline point that a generation of business people, venture investors and policy makers took away from Clayton M. Christensen’s 1997 classic, “The Innovator’s Dilemma,” which examined the process of disruptive change.

But a shift in thinking is under way, driven by altered circumstances. In the United States and abroad, the biggest economic and social challenges — and potential business opportunities — are problems in multifaceted fields like the environment, energy and health care that rely on complex systems.

Solutions won’t come from the next new gadget or clever software, though such innovations will help. Instead, they must plug into a larger network of change shaped by economics, regulation and policy. Progress, experts say, will depend on people in a wide range of disciplines, and collaboration across the public and private sectors.

“These days, more than ever, size matters in the innovation game,” said John Kao, a former professor at the Harvard business school and an innovation consultant to governments and corporations.In its economic recovery package, the Obama administration is financing programs to generate innovation with technology in health care and energy. The government will spend billions to accelerate the adoption of electronic patient records to help improve care and curb costs, and billions more to spur the installation of so-called smart grids that use sensors and computerized meters to reduce electricity consumption.

Read more . . .

Random Posts:

• Designing Responsible Behaviour
• Call for debate on killer robots
• Possible Fix For Global Warming?
• Thwarting Cyber Criminals
• Promising tests for MotionPower system to generate electricity from traffic

Related posts:

1. Can Governments Till the Fields of Innovation?
2. An Innovation Agenda
3. The many faces of innovation
4. Can Innovation Save the Economy?
5. Thinking Outside the Company’s Box

Tags: clayton m christensen, economic recovery, environment energy, harvard business school, Innovation, innovation game, john kao, large corporations, public and private sectors, size matters, social challenges, systems solutions, upstarts, venture investors

This entry was posted on Monday, May 25th, 2009 at 9:36 am and is filed under Innovation, NY Times. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.