Bioelectricity Promises More ‘Miles Per Acre’ Than Ethanol

Biofuels such as ethanol offer an alternative to petroleum for powering our cars, but growing energy crops to produce them can compete with food crops for farmland, and clearing forests to expand farmland will aggravate the climate change problem. How can we maximize our “miles per acre” from biomass?

Researchers writing in the online edition of the journal Science on May 7 say the best bet is to convert the biomass to electricity, rather than ethanol. They calculate that, compared to ethanol used for internal combustion engines, bioelectricity used for battery-powered vehicles would deliver an average of 80% more miles of transportation per acre of crops, while also providing double the greenhouse gas offsets to mitigate climate change.

“It’s a relatively obvious question once you ask it, but nobody had really asked it before,” says study co-author Chris Field, director of the Department of Global Ecology at the Carnegie Institution. “The kinds of motivations that have driven people to think about developing ethanol as a vehicle fuel have been somewhat different from those that have been motivating people to think about battery electric vehicles, but the overlap is in the area of maximizing efficiency and minimizing adverse impacts on climate.”

Field, who is also a professor of biology at Stanford University and a senior fellow at Stanford’s Woods Institute for the Environment, is part of a research team that includes lead author Elliott Campbell of the University of California, Merced, and David Lobell of Stanford’s Program on Food Security and the Environment. The researchers performed a life-cycle analysis of both bioelectricity and ethanol technologies, taking into account not only the energy produced by each technology, but also the energy consumed in producing the vehicles and fuels. For the analysis, they used publicly available data on vehicle efficiencies from the US Environmental Protection Agency and other organizations.

Bioelectricity was the clear winner in the transportation-miles-per-acre comparison, regardless of whether the energy was produced from corn or from switchgrass, a cellulose-based energy crop. For example, a small SUV powered by bioelectricity could travel nearly 14,000 highway miles on the net energy produced from an acre of switchgrass, while a comparable internal combustion vehicle could only travel about 9,000 miles on the highway. (Average mileage for both city and highway driving would be 15,000 miles for a biolelectric SUV and 8,000 miles for an internal combustion vehicle.)

Read more . . .

Related articles by Zemanta

• Another Blow to Ethanol: Biolectricity Is Greener (time.com)
• Biofuels vs. Biomass Electricity (technologyreview.com)
• Energy Secretary Chu Announces Biofuel Investment (usnews.com)

Random Posts:

• Snap and Search (No Words Needed)
• Combating climate change by observing the Earth
• Beneficial Biofuels: Leading National Experts Reach Consensus
• The Medium Is No Longer The Message, . . . You Are
• SW2 & More Update

Related posts:

1. Biofuel: Major Net Energy Gain From Switchgrass-based Ethanol
2. For the Volt, How’s Life After 40 (Miles)?
3. Hybrid Vehicles That Are Even More Efficient
4. Simple Device Which Uses Electrical Field Could Boost Gas Efficiency Up To 20%
5. Why Ethanol–Not Electric Cars and Hybrids–Is the Answer

Tags: battery powered vehicles, climate change problem, electric vehicles, energy crops, ethanol, food crops, food security, global ecology, Innovation, internal combustion engines

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 10th, 2009 at 10:46 am and is filed under Innovation, Project Energy, Science Digest / Science Daily. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.