Majority wants both punishment for tax evaders and things to go fine for themselves
In most modern states, central institutions are funded by public taxation. This means, however, that tax evaders must also be punished. Once such a system has been established, it is also good for the community: it makes co-existence easier and it helps maintain common standards. However, such advantageous institutions do not come about by themselves. The community must first agree that such a common punishment authority makes sense and decide what powers it should be given. Climate protection is a case in point, demonstrating that this cannot always be achieved. But how can a community agree on sensible institutions and self-limitations?
The Max Planck researchers allowed participants in a modified public goods game to decide whether to pay taxes towards a policing institution with their starting capital. They were additionally able to pay money into a common pot. The total paid in was then tripled and paid out to all participants. If taxes had been paid beforehand, free riders who did not contribute to the group pot were punished by the police. In the absence of taxation, however, there would be no police and the group would run the risk that no-one would pay into the common pot.
Police punishment of both free riders and tax evaders quickly established cooperative behaviour in the experiment. If, however, tax evaders were not punished, the opposite happened and the participants avoided paying taxes. Without policing, there was no longer any incentive to pay into the group pot, so reducing the profits for the group members. Ultimately, each individual thus benefits if tax evaders are punished.
But can participants foresee this development? To find out, the scientists gave the participants a choice: they were now able to choose individually whether they joined a group in which the police also punish tax evaders. Alternatively, they could choose a group in which only those participants who did not pay into the common pot were penalised. Faced with this choice, the majority preferred a community without punishment for tax evaders – with the result that virtually no taxes were paid and, subsequently, that contributions to the group pot also fell.
In a second experimental scenario, the players were instead able to decide by democratic vote whether, for all subsequent rounds, the police should be authorised to punish tax evaders as well as free riders or only free riders. In this case, the players clearly voted for institutions in which tax evaders were also punished. “People are often prepared to impose rules on themselves, but only if they know that these rules apply to everyone,” summarises Christian Hilbe, the lead author of the study. A majority decision ensures that all participants are equally affected by the outcome of the vote. This makes it easier to introduce rules and institutions which, while demanding individual sacrifice, are best for the group.
The Latest on: Democracy
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Democracy” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Democracy
- Democracy is neither fun nor satisfying these days | PennLive letterson May 18, 2024 at 6:43 am
Our state congressional delegations should reflect the will of a majority of voters in the entire state not just in separate state election districts.
- Trump’s voters let petty interests overshadow threat to democracy (Letter)on May 17, 2024 at 10:26 pm
If Trump assumes the presidency again, it will not be by force. Instead, he will have been returned to the White House by voters in a free election.
- Democracy is part of the American way. Why is the Republican Party ashamed of it? | Opinionon May 17, 2024 at 10:00 pm
In other words, a republic is a representative democracy, as opposed to direct democracy, but it is unquestionably a democracy. The Washington State GOP recently passed a resolution saying that people ...
- Misinformation is a 'real danger to our democracy.' What can election boards do about it?on May 17, 2024 at 5:00 pm
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, officials, advocates and experts have expressed concern over misinformation and disinformation about candidates and elections in Chicago, Cook County and ...
- When local reporters stop being scary to politicians, democracy sufferson May 17, 2024 at 3:31 pm
The essential check-and-balance on local government provided by reporters is now absent across much of rural America and becoming an afterthought in suburbs.
- Funding Problems Plague Oakland's New 'Democracy Dollars' Programon May 17, 2024 at 2:39 pm
Nearly three-quarters of Oakland voters (74%) approved an initiative in 2022 that took a comprehensive approach to campaign finance solutions in the city. However, one of its historic changes is in ...
- Democracy is a top concern for many voters. We asked them why.on May 17, 2024 at 1:03 pm
PerryUndem to conduct focus groups with undecided swing-state voters and delve deeper into how they're thinking about the state of our democracy.
- ‘Animosity’: MO session ends in GOP infighting, failed plan to limit direct democracyon May 17, 2024 at 12:00 pm
The Missouri General Assembly’s session ended with Republicans failing in their push to raise the threshold to change the state constitution.
- Corporate America is mobilizing to support democracy in 2024 and beyond. Here’s howon May 17, 2024 at 9:17 am
This year is consequential for democracy and businesses that depend on a stable government, the rule of law, and social cohesion to run smoothly. And yet, many of our fellow CEOs say they would prefer ...
- Assassination attempt in Slovakia seen as an attack on democracyon May 17, 2024 at 7:43 am
The assassination attempt against Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico has been widely condemned by world leaders as an attack on democracy. In Slovakia, the violent act similarly saw a unified ...
via Bing News